ZUKIWORLD Online | Suzuki 4x4 Editorial and Forum

ZUKIWORLD Discussion Forum => Suzuki 4x4 Forum => Topic started by: bandit86 on December 29, 2003, 01:26:35 PM

Title: sidekicks better than dodge.  evidence
Post by: bandit86 on December 29, 2003, 01:26:35 PM
I knew it
http://www2.itexas.net/smann/sidekick.htm
Title: Re: sidekicks better than dodge.  evidence
Post by: Natebert on December 29, 2003, 02:05:12 PM
My 99 16v Durango SMOKES my 95 16v Sidekick in EVERY way, cept one, Off-Road.  *grin*
Must be something wrong with the Dakota.

~Nate
Title: Re: sidekicks better than dodge.  evidence
Post by: bandit86 on December 29, 2003, 02:14:54 PM
forgot to put it in gear? Parking brake still on?
Title: Re: sidekicks better than dodge.  evidence
Post by: 1bigtracker on December 29, 2003, 04:01:19 PM
no hes just afraided to really jump on it.  i would be too if i had 8 extra valves.  lol  lata stu
Title: Re: sidekicks better than dodge.  evidence
Post by: lil_Truck on December 29, 2003, 11:33:36 PM
link didn't work for me???
Title: Re: sidekicks better than dodge.  evidence
Post by: Samurai_Hamster on December 30, 2003, 05:47:41 AM
In terms of overall reliability, I say zuke buries Dodge....I know from experience having owned both vehicles. :)
Title: Re: sidekicks better than dodge.  evidence
Post by: lil_Truck on December 30, 2003, 06:22:12 AM
Does anyone elses get from 0-60 in 6.7 sec's in their zuck?

I'd never thought to check??
Title: Re: sidekicks better than dodge.  evidence
Post by: SpinalTap on December 30, 2003, 07:35:12 AM
Quote
Does anyone elses get from 0-60 in 6.7 sec's in their zuck?

I'd never thought to check??


That is a pretty optimistic number for either of those vehicles...I'd like to know the conditions they used for timing...
Title: Re: sidekicks better than dodge.  evidence
Post by: NY_SIDEKICKER on December 30, 2003, 10:13:03 AM
Quote
link didn't work for me???

(http:// http://www2.itexas.net/smann/sidekick.htm )
Title: Re: sidekicks better than dodge.  evidence
Post by: NY_SIDEKICKER on December 30, 2003, 10:13:38 AM
IT WONT LET YOU POST IT HERE SORRY I TRIED!  :-/