Hello Guest

suzuki 3rd worst in jd powers?

  • 5 Replies
  • 1836 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline rkteckt

  • 214
  • 0
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
1991 samurai , Mall Crawler, neon green, YJ lift, Wifes vanity plates.
1988.5 tintop too many mods to list. The work samurai.
2005 Avalanche Z71
2003 Matrix XRS
1993 sidekick 4dr 2wd donor thats too nice to destroy yet. 1992 Toyo Pup POS

*

Offline wolf66

  • 193
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: suzuki 3rd worst in jd powers?
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2006, 11:35:32 AM »
Of course, all the sedans are made in Korea by Daihatsu?
 Somebody crappy, it was whoever was maken those crapy cars for GM a few years back, GM had 20% of Suzuki untill recently and i bet pressured em into to rebadging the crappy korean cars.  I bet the SUV/4x4's by them selves would test alot higher or we would all want to get rid of ours.  My 10 year old X90 looks alot better inside and out then my brothers 10 year old Accord.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2006, 03:17:34 PM by wolf66 »
'96 Suzuki X90-4" lift-snorkle-30x9.5's on 8x15 wheels-5.12 gears-winch-added rear seat-DT header-PioneerMP3-CB-GPS-roof rack-rear mounted full size spare

*

Offline 88Sammy

  • 68
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
    • JDM parts
Re: suzuki 3rd worst in jd powers?
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2006, 03:13:34 PM »
The Forenza, Verona and Reno are made by Daewoo in Korea.  They were forced on to ASMC. >:(

*

Offline reb

  • 195
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Victim of CRS--Can't Remember Anything.
Re: suzuki 3rd worst in jd powers?
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2006, 07:28:52 PM »
I have never thought much of JD Powers' reports.  Many makers like to brag about JD Powers initial quality ratings, which are meaningless to me because I consider long-term reliability and cost of ownership more relevant.  The problem I find with that article is that it the ratings are based on the number of problems reported.  No mention is made of the types of problems.  A scratch on the paint rates the same as a failed transmission.  More meaningful data can be found in consumers magazine reports, where categories of failures are listed.  When I researched before buying my '98, the reports on Sidekicks and Trackers in the magazines were excellent.

*

Offline jeffry

  • 87
  • 0
  • I Love ZUKIWORLD!
Re: suzuki 3rd worst in jd powers?
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2006, 06:40:36 PM »
another thing with JD Powers - when I had my Land Rover, it was consistently one of the lowest rated vehicles. Yet when looking at the complaints, the number one complaint about Discovery's was gas mileage (same with the Hummer). Hello? The sticker in the window tells you the expected gas mileage before you buy the vehicle. What do you expect when that is what you get? Somehow, I don't find gas mileage a valid complaint when it should be expected to be bad.

(certainly, there are other complaints with LR, but knock on wood, mine was always reliable, just thirsty, which is why I own a Zuk again).

*

Offline ebewley

  • 6566
  • 66
  • Gender: Male
  • ZUKIWORLD Online, Editor
    • ZUKIWORLD online
Re: suzuki 3rd worst in jd powers?
« Reply #5 on: August 18, 2006, 10:45:21 AM »
Gentlemen,

We're getting a bit off-topic here. If you must continue your discussion, please do so 'off-line' via PM. When communicating please refer to our policies and the use guidelines you agreed upon when registering.

[Off topic remarks have been removed]

Thank you, Eric
« Last Edit: August 18, 2006, 01:14:34 PM by ebewley »
Eric L. Bewley                               
Editor, ZUKIWORLD Online                   

Suzuki 4x4 Owners Association - Please Join  The ZUKIWORLD ORDER Today!
About ZUKIWORLD Online: We are an enthusiast web site dedicated to the promotion of the Suzuki Automobile as the best and most capable vehicle on the planet. We offer product reviews, Tech tips, DIY, Travel and Adventure, Forum, Technical information, Life Style, and so much more!