Ah, you have touched a sore nerve, Memphis.
Unfortunately, because Suzuki and Consumer's Union settled out of court on the matter of the Consumer's Report article in (I believe) the July 1988 issue concerning the Samurai's safety ratings, I cannot provide you with the URL Suzuki posted containing the incredibly biased documents, reports and videos (obtained during the Discovery phase of the suit by Suzuki) that they based the claims in the article on.
Perhaps the organization that has a backup of every web page ever created on the Internet has an archive copy of it.
The original website was
http://www.suzukivcu.com/ (now a placeholder site) if anyone can figure out how to access the archive of it, that would be nice.
One of the interesting tidbits of information in the findings by Consumer's Union was the fact that two other vehicles tested in the article actually had worse scores BEFORE CU started to play with the testing procedures specifically on the Samurai. The one I remember was the Ford Bronco II. (BTW, the Sidekick/Tracker was not even on the market at the time, so the testing - valid or invalid - does not apply to that vehicle.
As others have said, any vehicle, when driven recklessly, will fall over.
Since Consumer's Union decided to play fast and loose with the way they test SUVs in the Samurai article, they have cast an unsupportable bias against SUVs in the minds of consumers. Those familiar with the Suzuki vs Consumer's Union case now put zero faith in anything Consumer's Union publishes.
Buy whatever vehicle you want and drive it sensibly. I have an '88 Samurai with a 4.5" Breeze SPOA that I drive on the Interstate every day at 60-65 MPH with no handling problems -- mainly because I drive defensively and with common sense.