Talk about the turbo lag you will have with the turbo so far away from the intake. If I was going to spend that kinda money on a turbo set-up, I would put twins on my Cummins.

NO2 and a few extra engines will still cost half what that add on turbo costs. Heck, swapping a turbocharged Mazda RX 7 rotory will still be cheaper. Might loose a little low end but what the heck.

A buddy of mine had nitrous on a sj 410 body that he gutted to be as light as possible had to use wiesco pistons it had 100hp nos system. I guess it was about 10 years ago had paddle tires the bitch ran like a sculdid dog up to the day he blew it up. It was freakinn awesome

yeah, the lag time is the biggest issue, and the intercooler is not needed due to the long piping, and the fact that the air underneath the vehicle is cooling everything down anyways. but getting it all covered in mud might just kill  the cooling effect    i know a guy who blew up his ranger engine at glamis because he accidentally put 100 hp jet on, and three of the six pistons litteraly had 1/2 inch hole in them, and were recovered from the oil pan    let me tell you, this was the highlight of everyones day


and bigger turbines on a cummins  (we really need the drooling icon, seriously)  there some contractor that workd with my dad, and his dodge sounds like a boing 747 rolling by, I should swap one of those into the zuk and get all the power  i need     (then to handle it all, maybe some rockwell 2.5 axles, or unimogs, and some solid driveshafts, and maybe  a new frame to keep the engine from turing over  in the compartment)

jeez i type a lot huh?  guess im bored