Hello Guest

calmini or thorley header ???

  • 20 Replies
  • 8892 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline explosivo

  • 3157
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm in the northern part of that one state.
    • omghi2u Gen. Discussion Forums
Re: calmini or thorley header ???
« Reply #15 on: August 11, 2004, 08:15:32 AM »
Quote


That's just an Autozone generic air filter clamped on to the stock intake. It actual does not work very well like that. First problem, excess filter oil on the element drips onto header and makes fire! Second, water splashes right up and into this filter stalling the engine.

To do it over, I would extend a hose out to the inner fender well and put the filter into a mostly enclosed box. OR just put a good element in the stock air box.

-Eric

I had my filter like that for a while, and on top of the oil dripping on the hot manifold, I had the issue that it got noticably doggy when the engine bay heated up. :-/

Never had a problem with water stalling the engine, though... even when I took on a 3 foot deep mud puddle :)
omghi2.us[/url]
"Its a ZUKI thing. Doing more with less than less with more." -- HotRod

*

Offline Mike71

  • 1449
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: calmini or thorley header ???
« Reply #16 on: August 11, 2004, 09:33:01 AM »
Quote



Never had a problem with water stalling the engine, though... even when I took on a 3 foot deep mud puddle :)


just becareful with that..only takes one stall to total the engine =) i have seen/read about probably 6 explorers in the pasy year that have detonated the engine in a "puddle" lol i love that "it didnt look that deep" or " it started shallow" lol
623hp kb cobra sold! 100hp kick new DD :P

*

Offline Bigzook

  • *
  • 2206
  • 13
  • Gender: Male
  • Current owner of the famous Audi Kick
    • Donkey Worx Galleries
Re: calmini or thorley header ???
« Reply #17 on: August 11, 2004, 10:59:36 AM »
Ok that one took me a minute eric...

*

Offline steveofrost

  • 457
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • '91 SS JLX 4-Door
Re: calmini or thorley header ???
« Reply #18 on: August 12, 2004, 03:05:33 AM »
I think the tri-design from Calmini is a good choice, as long as you don't have to pass emissions. I think they even say on the site that they are not enviro friendly. I live in Canada, so I'm with Calmini. The Thorely header ( I have been told) is great and enviro safe, so if thats the concern, go with that.

steveo

*

Offline chopper

  • 57
  • 0
  • go where no man goes
Re: calmini or thorley header ???
« Reply #19 on: August 12, 2004, 06:21:06 AM »
i have the calmini header, i noticed a very good improvment in performance, especially highway driving. i have emissions i have to pass too and i passed with flying colors(well after i did a little tweaking to get me to pass heheheh) my vote goes to calmini
92'sas tracker 32" muds, oba, locked and loaded, 8274, toys
cardomain page http://www.cardomain.com/ride/553823

*

Offline mwracing

  • 2
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • WooHoo!!!
Re: calmini or thorley header ???
« Reply #20 on: August 12, 2004, 07:57:13 AM »
I ordered a Pace Setter after I rebuilt my 1.6 8v cuz a buddy of mine could get them dirt cheap, but it would not work on the 1.6.

Take this into consideration also, a 4 into 2 into 1 (calmini) is a better performance design than a 4 into 1.  Don't believe me, check out some of your local bike shops or sites.  There are a few web sites for motorcycle racing that show the horsepower difference between the two.  It may only be 1-3 hp difference, but when you are talking about 80hp, 1-3hp more is a noticable difference.