a friend of mines wife has a 99(i think) 5 speed tracker and he and she wants to lift it.  They where going to buy a RRO lift but i told them to wait till i asked you guys.  is the RRO lift any good?  and whats the diff. between the 93 tracker suspension and 99 tracker suspension?  could i just build a lift for it with strut spacers and stuff like that? ÂÂ
thanks stu
You need to determine the year of the Tracker. Due to the difference in years, 99 is the start of the 3rd generation Tracker (US model). The stock springs of the 3rd gen. provide a ~2" lift for the earlier gens. It's also been noted that the strut in the 3rd gen. is 2" longer than previous gen. So a swap if the springs and the front struts make a great cheap lift candidate for the earlier gens. (1st- 89 to 95, 2nd- 96 to 98). One of the major differences also in the 3rd gen. is the rack&pinion steering. Other gens. had the ball and socket steering box.
As for the suspension, there has to be a major change in the 3rd gen. Calmini, only manu with suspension systems with lower control arm replacement, has lifts of 2 and 3" for the 1st and 2nd gens, whereas for the 3rd gen. only has 2".
Now, I've got an XL7, which is a sense is a long wheelbase Vitara, 3rd gen. For a slight lift, I'm adding coil spacers front and rear. Then for the strut, I'm adding the 1st/2nd gen. strut mount. It's overall smaller in height than the 3rd gen. This shall provide better droop for the front. Rear shock will be something off the shelf. I'm also going to extend the bump stops. This one thing most people don't do, but is necessary when adding a suspension change and taller tires.
The tires are taller and thus provide a larger radius from the axle center. The change in radius is what most don't consider. Most figure the lift keeps the tire away from/off the body. On-road, yes it does to an extent. For off-road, mostly not. The suspension 'bottoms' out on either the shock, the tire to body contact, or the bump stop.