Hello Guest

Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini

  • 26 Replies
  • 8522 Views

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

*

Offline jagular7

  • 1026
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Jagular7
Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« on: December 01, 2003, 01:48:27 PM »
I've been reviewing and searching the archives all the way back to April concerning the front travel of the Vitara/XL-7/Trackick. I'll be playing this weekend at the Kansas Rocks ORV park this weekend with my XL-7 to try to take some measurements. With removal of the sway bar, I measured the static ride height of the coil to be 9", with full droop (extension of strut) to be 10.5" at the coil.
In my search, I've read that the front strut is mounted some ~2" too high in the tower. At full compression on the snubber, supposedly the strut still has ~2" more up travel.

Has anyone taken a measurement of the compressed strut and the extended strut, in or out of the truck?
In comparison, what are the same measurements for the Calmini strut from their lift?
Same for OME's strut (which is supposedly 1" taller than Calmini's)?

For Calmini's lift, I can only 'assume'  they have designed their lift not just as a lift, but a system to work together. Many have spoken about the lift being taller than adverised because it's 'designed' to carry more weight like a winch, bumpers, and gear.  Any comments?
Lenexa, KS

*

Offline Zukipilot

  • 7160
  • 25
  • Gender: Male
  • stretch the limits of reality!!!
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2003, 09:27:37 PM »
The Lift will give you a little extra without the added weight. I gained a little over 2" when I replaced my 2" Calmini Kit with the 3" Kit, and I'm loaded down with all of the safety accesories (cage, bumper, winch, sliders, etc).



stock vs 2"



stock vs 3"

Zig
Zukipilot
'92 Liberty Overland Sidekick

*

Offline Mikerpm4x4

  • 2875
  • 12
  • Gender: Male
  • Redline... all the time!
    • www.rpm4x4.com
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2003, 10:27:53 PM »
Ome is 3/4 longer than stock which equals about 1 1/4 at the wheel.

Mike
« Last Edit: December 01, 2003, 10:29:17 PM by Mikerpm4x4 »
If your not living life to the fullest then your not living at all.

You wont really know if your wrong till your upsidedown

*

Offline Iron_Crow

  • 34
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2003, 10:57:05 PM »
The front strut provided with the Calmini lift is an OEM replacement unless they've changed it.  Same travel as original equipment.
Iron Crow  -  An X-90 with freakishly large wheels, bent on world domination!  90:1 crawl ratio and ARB front & rear

*

Offline jagular7

  • 1026
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Jagular7
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2003, 02:20:45 AM »
It was the many discussions I've read from Zukipilot, YankeeTim, Mikerpm, and others's messages to where I got this information.

I've read even the coolest idea of replacing the strut with a bolt on upper control arm setup, then adding a shock.  This looks like a very simple idea, but then the lower control arm is actually bolted on the inside of the frame and from underneath. It's nearly impossible to keep the caster/camber even during it's cycle with unequal-length parallel control arms.

What limits the actual travel of the front suspension is not the strut but the geometric operating angles of the cv's. The suspension could be designed to function with tremendous travel, but then the cv/axles would limit/bind and may even damage or need frequent replacement.  The type or design of the front suspension doesn't relate to the operating range of the front drive axle.

I don't know what those operating angles are for the stock type Suzuki cv's, but I really doubt the short droop of the strut even comes close.  I'm looking at adding a 3/4" spacer up front along with a 1-3/4" spacer in the rear. I prefer a nose down attitude in my long wheelbase vehicles so that when the nose is higher some foot or two in a climb, the rear will follow rather than drive underneath the vehicle. I would like to get the most from my stock strut (and even the strut included in the lift system) in travel and keep the cv's in operating control.  By adding the 3/4" spacer, I'll be near/at the full extension of the strut.

By getting the measurements (and knowing where they were taken from), I can configure a strut spacer to configure the travel of the strut to work with the travel I prefer and the tire size (keep the tire off the body during compression).

Thanks for the info.


Lenexa, KS

*

Offline standog

  • 111
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2003, 02:42:45 AM »
I have been looking at the calmini lift and the rocky road lift. I am totaly lost as to which one is better. New control arm VRS longer strut's and matched coils. I have a 03 vitara. The 1 1/8 strut spacer seems like a cheap way to add some lift until the warrenty expires.  I am tring to get a 215/70/16 tire under for right now and think that  it would work with the spacer. Any ideas or comments would be great.

Thanks
Clay

*

Offline Zukipilot

  • 7160
  • 25
  • Gender: Male
  • stretch the limits of reality!!!
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2003, 03:57:55 AM »
You can get more drop out of your front end by flipping the upper strut mount, taping out the studs and mounting it up-side-down. This will give a factory length strut about 2" of drop.





I dont have any struts off of the vehicle to measure the travel, but if you are going to build something custom, remove your cv boots and the grease, then raise and lower the control arm where you can watch the exact limits of the cv travel.

Hope this helps,
Zig
Zukipilot
'92 Liberty Overland Sidekick

*

Offline jagular7

  • 1026
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Jagular7
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #7 on: December 02, 2003, 04:45:41 AM »
Quote
I have been looking at the calmini lift and the rocky road lift. I am totaly lost as to which one is better. New control arm VRS longer strut's and matched coils. I have a 03 vitara. The 1 1/8 strut spacer seems like a cheap way to add some lift until the warrenty expires.  I am tring to get a 215/70/16 tire under for right now and think that  it would work with the spacer. Any ideas or comments would be great.

Thanks
Clay


I'd have to say that you are looking at the strut in the wrong way. It has very little to do with the 'support' of the weight of the vehicle. It's the coil's responsibility to do so. The strut's main function is to isolate the frequency of the suspension's travel (basically act as a shock) as well as provide a structural mechanism for a suspension location.  
Lifting the Vitara will only come from the use of a different coil.  Currently though, I am running 225/70-16's on my stock aluminum rims (original was 235/60-16 [27.1" tall]). So the 215/70-16 (21.8" tall) would fit with no problems other than slightly off the speedo. (I've also read where there are some differences between same vehicles with same tires, etc and speedo reads differently.)

What I'm looking at is the travel (the amount of distance the strut has the capability of going through from total collapsed to fully extended). This way, I can mount it to match the function of the suspension, meaning, collapsed point (weight on snubber mount), fully extended (being that of the strut), and the static ride height with full weight on coil.
Lenexa, KS

*

Offline jagular7

  • 1026
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Jagular7
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #8 on: December 02, 2003, 04:50:02 AM »
Quote
You can get more drop out of your front end by flipping the upper strut mount, taping out the studs and mounting it up-side-down. This will give a factory length strut about 2" of drop.





I dont have any struts off of the vehicle to measure the travel, but if you are going to build something custom, remove your cv boots and the grease, then raise and lower the control arm where you can watch the exact limits of the cv travel.

Hope this helps,
Zig


I noticed this (Trac/kick) is a bit different in comparison to the Vitara/XL-7 model. There is actually a cone some 3" high. The cone is mounted from underneath the frame mount. The strut goes through to the top of the cone. The strut brace then is bolted to the top of the cone. Only way I can see anything changing is to redo the cone and make the strut mount lower in it. I'll shoot some pics (yah, got a digital finally) of it tonight.
Lenexa, KS

*

Offline Zukipilot

  • 7160
  • 25
  • Gender: Male
  • stretch the limits of reality!!!
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #9 on: December 02, 2003, 05:00:39 AM »
The Kick/Trackers attach like this. with mount flipped.

« Last Edit: December 02, 2003, 05:01:08 AM by Zukipilot »
Zukipilot
'92 Liberty Overland Sidekick

*

Offline jagular7

  • 1026
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Jagular7
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #10 on: December 02, 2003, 05:43:31 AM »
Quote
The Kick/Trackers attach like this. with mount flipped.



Saw that on Izook's site. Have a few more pics of that site dealing with the 9" lift and the Calmini's 3" lift.  In your pic, the 'cone' is only some 1.5" high and flipped. So flipping it gives you greater droop, but did anyone measure the collapsed length and adjust the bump stop (snubber) so that the strut won't get damaged?

 Here is a picture of Calmini's spacer for their strut sitting on the bench. The stock mount is situated like stock.

 Here is a picture of the strut installed with the spacer.

 Here is the finished product installed and ready for wheel mount.

 Here is a picture of the custom 9" lift on Izook's site. Here you can see the full droop and the angles of the cv's.  The 9" lift comprised of drop brackets for the strut, coil (used the stock coil), and lower control arm. For the difference in height, a custom bracket was fabbed to 'raise' the lower strut mount.  Stock strut was used.

(Hope the pics show up this time.)
Lenexa, KS

*

Offline Zukipilot

  • 7160
  • 25
  • Gender: Male
  • stretch the limits of reality!!!
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #11 on: December 02, 2003, 06:43:02 AM »
The top two pics are from when I did the 3" lift on my Kick ;) The bottom pic of Jim's custom made lift is alot like the Pro-Comp lift that use to be on the market (just MUCH taller) He did design all of the drop brackets to keep stock geometry, so that pic would be a good one to judge the maximum factory CV angles. The Calmini 3"kit (top two pics) use the shown drop bracket at the top of the strut to adjust for the ride height, and uses drop brackets to lower the diff to reduce cv angles.(can be seen in the same article you got the pics from)
Zig
Zukipilot
'92 Liberty Overland Sidekick

*

Offline standog

  • 111
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #12 on: December 02, 2003, 06:46:43 AM »
thanks for explaining it to me. Are new a arms needed or are the stock ones stong enough. The rocky road kit looks like it has more but is it really better. I am new to this so please be kind if I am asking dumb questions.

thanks

Clay

*

Offline Rhinoman

  • 4502
  • 36
  • Gender: Male
  • Bend it, Break it, Fix it
    • Rhinoman
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #13 on: December 02, 2003, 07:03:33 AM »
Zukipilot: I looked at flipping the top strut mount. It is only one inch high and as the mounting part is offset you only drop the strut 3/4". I know thats a lot less than 2 " of droop. I measured strut travel at 6" total, in stock trim your only using  just over 4" I calculated the two inch strut spacers gave 44% more travel.
Jagular 7: Like I said I took the spring off and compressed the suspension fully with a hydraulic jack so it was hard against the bump stop. Thats how I ascertained there was an extra two inches of travel left.
I have an extra 1.5" of travel left before the CV joint binds but I like to have a good margin. I think next I'll make some Calmini style drop brackets for the front axle, that'll take some of the angle off the CVs and then go to OME struts.
I'm not a fan of the spring spacers my lift kit came with +2" springs and rear shocks. Without much droop left on the front the suspension would top out just pulling away gently and front wheels would lift real easy in the corners. Thats why I started looking into the strut travel
2000 Vitara 1.6, 3+3 Lift, 33"MTs, 5:83s, LWB brakes, Winch, Snorkel, Safari Rack
1986 SJ413K PickUp, 1.6L conversion.

OBD1 - Full diagnostics on a PC/Laptop: http://www.rhinopower.org

*

Offline jagular7

  • 1026
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Jagular7
Re: Travel length of Strut, Stock vs. Calmini
« Reply #14 on: December 02, 2003, 07:43:46 AM »
Quote
Zukipilot: I looked at flipping the top strut mount. It is only one inch high and as the mounting part is offset you only drop the strut 3/4". I know thats a lot less than 2 " of droop. I measured strut travel at 6" total, in stock trim your only using  just over 4" I calculated the two inch strut spacers gave 44% more travel.


The Vitara/XL-7 model (US model) has a much larger strut mount. I think it was you which noted the difference in travel for the stock strut. Thanks.

Quote
Jagular 7: Like I said I took the spring off and compressed the suspension fully with a hydraulic jack so it was hard against the bump stop. Thats how I ascertained there was an extra two inches of travel left.


Thanks for the measurement effort. I've been on KYB's and Monroe's web site looking for info pertaining to their strut replacements. Monroe's site had more info, but no info for the actual p/n application. Go figure.

Quote
I have an extra 1.5" of travel left before the CV joint binds but I like to have a good margin.


From this, I suspect you've only lowered the strut 1/2" (difference between the 2" and 1.5" of margin). Or did you determine a point without the spring to where the cv will bind at a droop condition? Which joint starts to bind inner or outer?

Quote
I think next I'll make some Calmini style drop brackets for the front axle, that'll take some of the angle off the CVs and then go to OME struts.


Is that what their brackets do? I'll have to go back to Zukipilot's install and read again. I've read also, Calmini will sell you individual parts of their kit. Have you tried this? By lowering the front axle housing, isn't the pinion snout have crossmember interference?


Quote
I'm not a fan of the spring spacers my lift kit came with +2" springs and rear shocks. Without much droop left on the front the suspension would top out just pulling away gently and front wheels would lift real easy in the corners. Thats why I started looking into the strut travel


I think of the coil spring spacers as a quick/easy way of slight lift. In time, the coils will fatigue and will need replacement. Currently, I have a stock suspended 2002 XL-7. I'm running with decent tread 225/70-16's. For the time being, a slight lift will work for me to get my long belly off the ground. Adding longer rear shocks shouldn't be as much of a problem as getting longer travel out of the strut. When I go larger in tire diameter with a lift, I know I'll be lowering the bump stop to protect some sheetmetal, but this will coincide with the travel of the strut and the size of the tire.  I'd want to match the travel of the strut with the travel of the cv's, front suspension, and the tire.
I'm debating if there is another application of a strut which could apply to the Vitara/XL-7. These struts should not be just one application only.  If it turns out this way, I guess a costum top mount will have to be used to get maximum travel up/down capability of the strut with cv's and tire size as main applications.
Lenexa, KS